Experiments & Tests — HHM

Your jumping-off point to all validation runs, methods pages, and Zenodo records.

What this page is

One place to browse all tests

This hub collects every HHM test I’ve run so far. Each entry has a short description and a link to a methods/results HTML page or (when only archived) a Zenodo DOI. I’m still improving how I present scientific outputs—earlier runs focused on stress-testing the model across many fields first, then backfilling the polished write-ups.

Transparency: some early studies do not follow every step in the appendices/checklists exactly. Where a step is missing (e.g., certain nulls, CI method detail, or registry metadata), I flag it on the test’s page and plan incremental updates. Thanks for your patience while I learn and standardize the presentation layer.
How to read this hub

What you’ll find on each test page

At a glance

  • Plain-language summary of the question
  • Exact inputs (files, versions) and preprocessing
  • Operators/components used and thresholds
  • Nulls, resampling/CI, and result cards

Reproduce & extend

  • Commands or notebook steps
  • Links to data and provenance sheets
  • “Known gaps” + “Next fixes” checklists
  • Issue tracker link (or contact) for feedback

Featured tests

HHM v2.2 — Theory of Everything Validation

The first published and validated Ψ-Theory of Everything, unifying six scientific domains: neuroscience, biology, cosmology, quantum physics, particle physics, and information theory. Empirical tests across fMRI, CMB, LIGO, and enwik9 datasets validate MT0001, MT0003, and T014 with P ≥ 0.95.

Builds on HHM v2.1 (DOI) and extends into historical and biological systems (DOI, DOI).

Neuroscience — EEG / fMRI collapses

Identity, echo, and entropy across human recordings; links to cross-domain T014 matches when available.

Cosmology — CMB / LIGO & field structure

Low-ℓ spherical harmonics and gravitational signals; axial saturation and identity under noise.

Cross-Cultural — Ancient Calendars & Modal Universalism

Supplementary materials and datasets for two major cross-cultural studies: Field-Based Conceptualization of Time and Knowledge in Ancient Calendars and Modal Universalism: Rhythmic Structures in Human Time, Symbol, and Consciousness.

All tests (growing registry)

Domain Test Summary Link / DOI Status
Cross-domain HHM v2.2 — ToE Validation Core validation of HHM as a Ψ-Theory of Everything; MT0001, MT0003, T014; P ≥ 0.95 across six domains. DOI  |  JSON flagship
Neuroscience EEG / fMRI identity & echo OP001/003/009/006 on resting & task; T014 cross-checks against symbolic sets. Neuro v1 published
Cosmology CMB & LIGO field analyses Axial saturation (MT0001) & robust identity under noise (T014) examples. Cosmology v1 published
Solar System OP022/OP023 Multi-Planet Perihelion-relative timing; φ offsets and CI by planet; repro scripts. Solar-system v1 published
Cross-Cultural Ancient Calendars — Field-Based Conceptualization Field-based interpretation of time/knowledge across ancient calendar systems, including a Rongorongo case study. DOI archived
Cross-Cultural Modal Universalism — Rhythmic Structures Analysis of rhythmic structures across global symbolic systems; supports RMU 030 (Modal Universalism). DOI archived
Cross-domain ToE validation dataset (JSON) Consolidated runs for MT0001/0003/T014 across domains. ToEvalidationcomplete.json registry

About process, gaps, and upcoming fixes

My priority the past months was broad validation—stress-testing HHM in neuroscience, cosmology, biology, information theory, and particle/quantum contexts—before polishing every paper’s presentation. Some items in older pages are marked “to be completed” (e.g., expanded null descriptions, CI resampling settings, or full provenance sheets). I’m updating these iteratively using the same templates recommended in the Appendices.

What may be missing

  • Explicit null variants beyond the primary shuffle/scramble
  • Bootstrap parameters (B, seed) and CI flavor notes
  • Full dataset provenance tables per artifact
  • Result-card JSON attached inline for each figure

What I’m adding next

  • Appendix-aligned ResultCard blocks per test
  • Reproduction commands + environment pinning
  • Zenodo DOIs for each standalone test
  • Automated checks for thresholds/nulls compliance

Contribute or request a check

Want a new dataset analyzed with the HHM operators, or to propose a missing null? Send a note on the Community page or email via About / Contact. If you have a Zenodo upload you’d like linked here, include its DOI and a one-sentence summary.